Talent Acquisition Function Assessment

A working set of questions for leaders thinking carefully about their TA function.

This is a self-assessment, not a scored test. The questions are designed to surface where gaps, friction points, and assumptions may exist inside your TA function — so you can decide for yourself what's working, what isn't, and what's worth a closer look.

How to use this

Answer for today

Reflect on how your function actually operates right now and not how it's described in a slide deck or how it operated last year.

Notice what you choose

The value is in what each question prompts you to consider. If a question gives you pause, that's information worth holding onto.

Compare perspectives

Consider asking a hiring manager, a recruiter on your team, and an HR peer to answer the same questions. The deltas are often instructive.

Alignment with the business

How connected is TA to the operating reality and direction of the company it serves?

01
Does your TA team have visibility into the company's 12 to 24 month workforce plan?
Consider whether a workforce plan exists, who built it, and whether TA was part of that conversation.
A
A formal workforce plan does not currently exist.
B
A plan exists, but TA was not involved in building it.
C
TA was consulted during the planning process.
D
TA is a co-owner of the workforce plan with operations, finance, and HR.
02
If a recruiter on your team were asked to name the company's top three operational priorities this year, how would they likely respond?
This is about business literacy across the team and not just at the leadership level.
A
Most would struggle to name them with confidence.
B
It would depend heavily on tenure and individual interest.
C
Most could name them, with varying depth of understanding.
D
They could name them and explain how each connects to hiring decisions.
03
Has the organization identified which specific roles are mission-critical to the year ahead?
Mission-critical here means: roles where a mis-hire, vacancy, or delayed fill would materially affect operations, revenue, or risk.
A
No, all open roles are treated with roughly equal priority.
B
Informally, in conversation, but not documented.
C
Yes, with a documented list — though it doesn't always drive resourcing.
D
Yes, and resourcing, cadence, and senior attention reflect that prioritization.
04
When senior leadership references hiring in executive conversations, how is it most often framed?
The language leaders use about TA often reveals how the function is positioned in the organization.
A
As a cost, a bottleneck, or a source of friction.
B
As an operational necessity to be managed.
C
As a capability worth investing in.
D
As a strategic capability tied directly to business outcomes.
Team and capability

What is the current shape, skill profile, and development trajectory of your TA team?

05
For your most critical roles, what is the primary source of candidates?
This is a factual question about where the people you ultimately hire come from and not where you wish they came from.
A
Inbound applicants and job board responses.
B
A mix of inbound and light outbound outreach.
C
Active sourcing of passive candidates by recruiters on the team.
D
Active sourcing combined with cultivated talent communities and external search partners as needed.
06
When a recruiter speaks with a senior, in-demand candidate, what is the typical quality of that conversation?
Consider the kind of dialogue a senior candidate (employed, with options) would actually have when contacted by your team.
A
Primarily scripted; difficult to hold a senior candidate's interest beyond a few minutes.
B
Varies considerably, a few recruiters are strong, others are not.
C
Generally substantive, with preparation; depth varies by individual.
D
Consistently business-fluent across the team; senior candidates are engaged as peers.
07
In the past 12 months, what development has your TA team received beyond product and ATS training?
Vendor demos and platform certifications are useful, but distinct from broader recruiter development.
A
None, learning has been entirely on the job.
B
Ad hoc, a webinar or conference here and there.
C
A development program exists, with inconsistent execution.
D
A structured, sequenced development arc with regular facilitator-led sessions.
08
When a search runs into difficulty, what is the typical pattern of response on your team?
Examples of difficulty: a stalled pipeline, a lost finalist, a misaligned hiring manager.
A
The team waits for direction from leadership before responding.
B
A manager typically steps in to triage and reassign.
C
Recruiters surface the issue and ask for guidance.
D
Recruiters identify the issue, propose adjustments, and act.
Process and friction

Where do delays, drop-offs, and friction live in your end-to-end hiring process?

09
When a new requisition is opened, what typically happens at the start?
Intake conversations vary widely across organizations and the variation tends to predict downstream friction.
A
The job description is handed over and recruiting begins immediately.
B
An informal conversation occurs when the recruiter requests one.
C
A standard intake template is used, with quality varying by hiring manager.
D
A structured intake is required on every requisition for covering criteria, target profile, and outreach approach.
10
How often does the TA team review live searches together in a structured way?
Consider whether reviews happen on a defined cadence, and what those reviews actually focus on.
A
Rarely, or only when something has gone wrong.
B
Monthly or quarterly, primarily as status updates.
C
Weekly, focused mostly on numbers and open requisitions.
D
Weekly, structured to include strategy and coaching on critical searches.
11
From first interview to verbal offer, how long does a strong candidate typically wait?
If this number isn't immediately known, that itself is a finding worth noting.
A
This timing isn't currently tracked cleanly.
B
Three weeks or more, with candidate drop-off occurring as a result.
C
Two to three weeks, with known friction around scheduling and approvals.
D
Under two weeks for strong candidates, by design.
12
When a hiring manager has a critical role to fill, where do they typically start?
This question speaks to the level of trust hiring managers place in the TA function.
A
They engage their own network or an external recruiter first.
B
Some come to TA first; others do not. It varies by manager.
C
They come to TA first, while also doing their own outreach in parallel.
D
TA is their default partner, and they trust the process to deliver.
Experience candidates and hiring managers

What is the quality of the experience the function is delivering, on both sides of the table?

13
What is the standard for communication with candidates who apply or are sourced?
Including those not moved forward to interviews.
A
Most candidates do not receive a response unless they're advanced.
B
Automated responses are standard; human follow-up is inconsistent.
C
Active candidates receive consistent human follow-up; passive sourced candidates, less so.
D
Personalized, timely communication is an enforced standard regardless of source.
14
When reaching out to a senior passive candidate, what does the outreach typically look like?
Consider what would actually be sent and not what your team aspires to send.
A
A standard template used across most roles.
B
A personalized subject line, with a largely generic body.
C
Researched and role-specific, written by junior staff.
D
Researched, written or reviewed by senior recruiters, with real business context.
15
If hiring managers were asked to rate the TA function on a scale of 1–10, what would the honest average likely be?
Estimate based on what you actually hear, not what is said in formal feedback.
A
4 or below.
B
5 to 6.
C
7 to 8.
D
9 or 10.
16
When offers are extended to top-choice candidates, what is the typical acceptance rate?
Offer acceptance is one of the cleanest indicators of the candidate experience and pre-offer alignment.
A
Under 60%.
B
Between 60% and 75%.
C
Between 75% and 90%.
D
Above 90%.
Systems, data, and ROI

Are the tools, metrics, and financial story behind TA serving the function and the people who fund it?

17
What share of your ATS and broader TA tech stack capabilities is your team actively using?
Most organizations use a fraction of what their platforms can do. The first step is naming the actual share.
A
Less than 25% of it's primarily used as a record-keeping system.
B
Between 25% and 50%, core workflows only.
C
Between 50% and 75%, with known gaps in higher-value features.
D
75% or more, actively activated across the team.
18
When TA reports up to executive leadership, which kinds of metrics dominate the conversation?
Notice not what's tracked, but what actually gets discussed when the function is presented.
A
Activity metrics, requisitions open, applications received, interviews held.
B
Efficiency metrics, time to fill, cost per hire.
C
Outcome metrics, quality of hire, offer acceptance, retention.
D
Business-impact metrics, agency spend avoided, time to productivity, revenue or output per hire.
19
What is the trajectory of your third-party agency and search firm spend over the last 24 months?
External spend is often a useful indicator of internal capability, and how that capability is shifting.
A
Rising, without a clear plan to address it.
B
Roughly flat, at a level the business considers significant.
C
Declining as internal sourcing capability has grown.
D
Used selectively and strategically, only where internal capacity is the wrong fit.
20
If the CFO asked what the business received in return for last year's TA investment, how could you respond?
Consider whether the answer would describe activity, hires made, or financial impact.
A
The answer would describe hires made, not value delivered.
B
A partial answer to some metrics, not a full financial story.
C
A full answer could be assembled with some effort.
D
A clear ROI story is already told to leadership on a regular cadence.
Adaptation and readiness

How prepared is the function for what the labor market, candidates, and technology are doing next?

21
Outside of your own website and job postings, how visible is the company to the talent you most want to hire?
Visibility includes content, leader presence, industry participation, and presence in the venues where your target talent actually spends time.
A
Largely invisible outside of where candidates seek us out.
B
Some LinkedIn activity, primarily job-related.
C
Active employer-brand content, with uneven consistency.
D
Recognized in our sector leaders and recruiters publish, and target candidates know who we are.
22
For specialized roles you hire repeatedly, do you have a known and nurtured pool of relevant talent?
A talent pool is different from a list of past applicants and it implies relationships, engagement, and current data.
A
Every search starts from a cold beginning.
B
Some individual recruiters maintain informal networks.
C
Talent pools exist but are not actively nurtured.
D
Mapped, named, regularly engaged talent communities sit behind our hardest roles.
23
If hiring volume were to double over the next 90 days, how would the function respond?
This is a question about capacity design, not heroics.
A
The function would struggle to maintain quality.
B
We would manage with overtime and outside support, with some quality cost.
C
We would scale up through a planned approach, with strain.
D
We are designed for variable volume and would flex without quality loss.
24
How is your team adopting and applying new tools including AI-enabled sourcing, screening, and engagement capabilities?
Adoption sits on a spectrum from cautious to systemic. Either end can be defensible depending on context.
A
We have not yet evaluated newer tools in a structured way.
B
Individual recruiters experiment; no team-wide standard exists.
C
We have selected tools and are working through adoption inconsistently.
D
We have an intentional approach to tool selection, adoption, and measurement.
0 of 24 questions answered

See your responses summarized

The summary on the next screen shows what you selected across all six sections and identifies the questions where your answers suggest the most useful follow-up reflection. It is not a score or a grade.

Your Responses · Summary

A summary of what you indicated across six dimensions of your TA function.

This view reflects your own answers back to you. It does not score or rank your function. The patterns below are intended to make any concentrations whether of strength or of friction visible enough to discuss with your team.

Questions worth revisiting

Based on the answers you indicated, these are the areas where the original questions may be worth a second pass alone, with your team, or with someone outside the function.

If a conversation would be useful

If anything in this assessment prompted a question worth talking through, Vitality TA offers a no-cost working call to discuss your responses. It is a conversation, not a sales meeting. If outside support would help, that becomes clear. If it would not, that becomes equally clear.

Request a Working Call